Sunday, November 30, 2008
No sight of solution for crisis
Friday, November 28, 2008
I want this mobile phone
The economics related to womens' legs
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Tada yori takai mono wa nai
Serial breakdown
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Nested dilemmas
{ if(is there a need to study too much than required to pass == no)
{ then, why am I having a problem despite coming to this nested if section? }
}
}
}
The answer is: guilt conscience, my legacy haunts me... The reason not to compete for studying gets stronger when I see undeserving people get more grade, less hard working people get more success, parasites beating the hosts. Such is life.... I need to find a motivation to study well.
The paradigm based on a single example
The one-sidedness fallacy does not make an argument invalid. It may not even make the argument unsound. The fallacy consists in persuading readers, and perhaps ourselves, that we have said enough to tilt the scale of evidence and therefore enough to justify a judgment. If we have been one-sided, though, then we haven't yet said enough to justify a judgment. The arguments on the other side may be stronger than our own. We won't know until we examine them.
So the one-sidedness fallacy doesn't mean that your premises are false or irrelevant, only that they are incomplete. You may have appealed only to relevant considerations, but you haven't yet appealed to all relevant considerations.
Getting back, why am I writing about this now? I just came back from a visiting professor (from a good American University)'s lecture and I am appalled by what she said. She too despite being a prof. for so many years fell for the same fallacy when she told that Lehman Brothers went out of business because they did not have a corporate social responsibility. And one needs that to be doing CSR to stay in the business for long. Well, maybe the Professoree did not know that Lehman Brothers was a 150 year old company. Just because it failed, you cannot blame it on not doing CSR. Such a pathetic example she had given, and that too being a professor. Maybe she doesnt even understand and know what poverty, pollution, etc is in the first place and then to do CSR to eradicate them. What a pathetic BS class early in the morning...Saturday, November 22, 2008
When will India toe the line?
Best of both worlds for the champions
Monday, November 17, 2008
Funding study time prudentially
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Sbarro Aero
Christmas
The darkness starts surrounding you, yet there is light
Endurance test
Marc Faber's comments
The quicksand and the vine
In the 2000 movie “The Replacements” with Keanu Reeves, “replacement” players come together to play the last five games of the season after a professional football players’ strike. During a team meeting the replacement coach played by Jack Warden asks about the new players fears. “A real man confronts his fears.” says Warden. After a few funny comments about spiders and insects, Keanu says that he’s afraid of quicksand. Quicksand he goes to explain, is the feeling that everything is going well and then one thing goes wrong, then another and then another. Pretty soon you feel as if nothing you can do will help get you out of the trouble you’re in. In other words – you’re in quicksand.
You try something different in the hopes it will fix the problem. And then another thing, and then another. Pretty soon you’re in quicksand.
As the old Tarzan movies showed us, the first thing you need to do to get out of quicksand is make sure you fall into it close to a strong vine. Grab the vine and pull yourself up out of the quicksand. But to successfully extract yourself, make sure you don’t struggle too much. Take your time, slowly pull yourself up and you will find your footing.
So where is the vine you can grab onto to pull itself out of the quicksand?
Go back to the things that got you where you are and always know what and where your string vine is.
Ultimate interview question
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Anyone game for it?
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
New initiatives
Questions to ask before outsourcing
- Is the activity central to generating profits or creating competitive advantage?
- Is the job a routine task that could be easily communicated to someone else?
- Does the task wastes valuable time and energy?
- Is the function temporary, or does it recurs in cycles?
- Does the activity drains resources that could be better used elsewhere?
- Is the skill required for the job so specialized that it costs more to train someone in-house to do it?
- Is it something nobody wants to do?