tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5840760331237002003.post3364635669200060725..comments2024-03-01T13:54:23.181+05:30Comments on Think again: Cognitive miserAjit Jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13932393109451200513noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5840760331237002003.post-6621198009961743402012-09-20T20:18:01.265+05:302012-09-20T20:18:01.265+05:30NI-Systemo_v3 - you should review your answer to t...NI-Systemo_v3 - you should review your answer to the bat and ball. The actual equation is as follows:<br />x + y = 1.10 <br /><br />x = bat <br />y = ball <br /><br />Bat costs $1 more than the ball, so x = y + 1 <br /><br />2y + 1 = 1.10<br /><br />Nice try thoughAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5840760331237002003.post-23882825939633851122009-12-03T11:14:01.913+05:302009-12-03T11:14:01.913+05:30Let me see now... It can be or B, though logicall...Let me see now... It can be or B, though logically C sounds the best. There is no hard evidence to say that the answer is is is 'A'. Like I said it can be B as well... Think again!<br /><br />And the second one... I dont agree at all...<br />Going by equations - x+1=y wherein x is ball and y is the bats cost... so u see the explanation of that prof or ur understanding of both the cases are questionable!!<br /><br />As far as human pysch, feelings and instincts are concerned, u might not consider it for such a thing as the 1st case as you dont have much confirmative info about it!! way to got - Diplomatic... I dont see any probs with that!!!NI-Yantra_v3https://www.blogger.com/profile/06224309983763155314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5840760331237002003.post-24029975561088524552009-11-29T15:26:59.040+05:302009-11-29T15:26:59.040+05:30Hahaha... Nice thought. Now this is going beyond t...Hahaha... Nice thought. Now this is going beyond the normal assumptions on which communications is made. Animals are usually not named like this. If this were so, anyone can also argue that for every word you say, I am assuming a different meaning and we would never be able to communicate with each other. :)Ajit Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13932393109451200513noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5840760331237002003.post-51288157047333631682009-11-29T06:40:52.166+05:302009-11-29T06:40:52.166+05:30"Is a married person looking at an unmarried ..."Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?" The correct answer actually is C). At no point is Anne identified as being a person; she could in fact be an animal. Therefore, based on what we are given, we cannot determine the answer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com